Asus ROG RAMPAGE VI APEX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Boot Drive176% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus ROG RAMPAGE VI APEX  (all builds)
Memory23.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190225
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 30 '19 at 11:25
Run Duration341 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7900X
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 95.1
1-Core 148
2-Core 294
99% 179 Pts
4-Core 570
8-Core 1,155
101% 862 Pts
64-Core 2,047
127% 2,047 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 101%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 425.31
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 93% Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 847 900 804 905 890 905 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
176% Outstanding
Read 928
Write 886
Mixed 675
SusWrite 875
189% 841 MB/s
4K Read 42.7
4K Write 95.8
4K Mixed 57.4
189% 65.3 MB/s
DQ Read 609
DQ Write 604
DQ Mixed 603
454% 605 MB/s
Poor: 113%
This bench: 176%
Great: 541%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2901 2893 2896 2894 2895 2896 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
280% Outstanding
Read 580
Write 2,222
Mixed 830
SusWrite 2896
375% 1,632 MB/s
4K Read 14.6
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 22.7
114% 51.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,138
DQ Write 961
DQ Mixed 1,028
776% 1,043 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 280%
Great: 487%
Crucial MX300 SATA M.2 525GB-$140
489GB free
Firmware: M0CR031
SusWrite @10s intervals: 459 482 281 245 245 244 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
90.8% Outstanding
Read 427
Write 470
Mixed 380
SusWrite 326
90% 401 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 91.1
4K Mixed 33.9
128% 49.6 MB/s
DQ Read 345
DQ Write 314
DQ Mixed 319
242% 326 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 90.8%
Great: 98%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 190GB
86GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 575
Write 2,430
Mixed 820
291% 1,275 MB/s
4K Read 14.7
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 21.4
117% 54.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1190
DQ Write 990
DQ Mixed 1,065
804% 1,082 MB/s
Poor: 50% Great: 174%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 1.5TB
1TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2620 2615 2642 2622 2629 2610 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
457% Outstanding
Read 2,942
Write 2694
Mixed 2,894
SusWrite 2,623
629% 2,788 MB/s
4K Read 137
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 121
427% 127 MB/s
DQ Read 1,171
DQ Write 972
DQ Mixed 1,052
793% 1,065 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 457%
Great: 446%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 71GB
66GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 3,016
Write 2,797
Mixed 2,934
651% 2,916 MB/s
4K Read 139
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 131
441% 129 MB/s
DQ Read 1,207
DQ Write 1,034
DQ Mixed 1,104
832% 1,115 MB/s
Asmt ASM1352R-Fast 8TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 279 292 280 292 295 292 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 27% Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C14 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
160% Outstanding
MC Read 54
MC Write 91.6
MC Mixed 49.2
186% 64.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 27.7
SC Mixed 14.9
52% 18.3 GB/s
Latency 56.7
71% 56.7 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 160%
Great: 144%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG RAMPAGE VI APEX Builds (Compare 308 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG RAMPAGE VI APEX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $1,063
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback