Asrock Z370 Professional Gaming i7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship
-
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics58.6% is a reasonable 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
MotherboardAsrock Z370 Professional Gaming i7  (all builds)
Memory25.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181108
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateApr 30 '19 at 10:14
Run Duration256 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i7-8700K-$355
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
104% Outstanding
SC Int 131
SC Float 138
SC Mixed 135
108% 134 Pts
QC Int 475
QC Float 522
QC Mixed 504
113% 500 Pts
MC Int 935
MC Float 1,127
MC Mixed 992
152% 1,018 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 104%
Great: 123%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-$329
Asus(1043 8466) 3GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 418.96
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
58.6% Above average
Lighting 157
Reflection 125
Parallax 199
53% 160 fps
MRender 135
Gravity 187
Splatting 106
63% 143 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 68%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$133
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 2,462
Write 2,378
Mixed 1,606
478% 2,149 MB/s
4K Read 66.2
4K Write 168
4K Mixed 91.1
306% 108 MB/s
DQ Read 1,453
DQ Write 1,264
DQ Mixed 1,339
1,009% 1,352 MB/s
Poor: 198% Great: 323%
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$120
7GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 506
Write 491
Mixed 388
103% 462 MB/s
4K Read 47.8
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 64.9
220% 78.2 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 245
215% 321 MB/s
Poor: 70% Great: 125%
Sandisk PLUS 1000GB
25GB free
Firmware: UH4400RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 405 295 105 181 34 4.3 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
52.1% Above average
Read 461
Write 378
Mixed 297
SusWrite 171
73% 327 MB/s
4K Read 15.6
4K Write 33.5
4K Mixed 15.3
61% 21.5 MB/s
DQ Read 120
DQ Write 91.1
DQ Mixed 30.6
43% 80.5 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 57%
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$66
7GB free
Firmware: 001C Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 1,384
Write 934
Mixed 880
236% 1,066 MB/s
4K Read 59
4K Write 172
4K Mixed 78.4
281% 103 MB/s
DQ Read 334
DQ Write 874
DQ Mixed 220
278% 476 MB/s
Poor: 122% Great: 211%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$70
75GB free
Firmware: CC54
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 86 87 87 87 90 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
50.1% Above average
Read 87.6
Write 69
Mixed 61.8
SusWrite 86.8
56% 76.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 99%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$83
579GB free
Firmware: CC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 99 99 101 99 101 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
72.6% Very good
Read 154
Write 99.6
Mixed 67.8
SusWrite 98.7
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
163% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
71.6% Very good
MC Read 26
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 22
71% 25 GB/s
SC Read 17.6
SC Write 27.5
SC Mixed 23.2
65% 22.8 GB/s
Latency 67.3
59% 67.3 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 108%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

Typical Z370 Professional Gaming i7 Builds (Compare 561 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 127%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 127%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 114%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock Z370 Professional Gaming i7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 112% - Outstanding Total price: $1,418
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $355Nvidia GTX 1070 $380Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $92
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 $139Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $208Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $99
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $108Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $808Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $93
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $90SanDisk Extreme 64GB $128
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $601SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $77Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $95SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback