Asrock A320M-HDV R3.0

Performance Results


Gaming 42% Speed boat	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 38% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	49.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	82.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.

Run History

23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asrock A320M-HDV R3.0 (all builds)
Memory	5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181005
Uptime	8.5 Days
Run Date	Apr 30 '19 at 02:37
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$183 620,614 User benchmarks, average bench 77% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	78.6% Very good	Memory 80.7 1-Core 109 2-Core 219 78% 136 Pts	4-Core 412 8-Core 681 69% 546 Pts	64-Core 847 57% 847 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 78.6% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$220 659,180 User benchmarks, average bench 55% MSI(1462 8A92) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1410 MHz, MLim: 2030 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.4.1 Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	49.8% Average	Lighting 60.1 Reflection 72.5 Parallax 77.6 49% 70.1 fps	MRender 73 Gravity 61.7 Splatting 60.4 51% 65 fps
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 49.8% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Gigabyte UD PRO 512GB-$76 2,336 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 207GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM13.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 344 135 84 174 97 224 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	82.9% Excellent	Read 502 Write 450 Mixed 399 SusWrite 176 85% 382 MB/s	4K Read 27.2 4K Write 63.6 4K Mixed 33.9 118% 41.6 MB/s	DQ Read 346 DQ Write 348 DQ Mixed 193 188% 296 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 82.9% Great: 105%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB 58,794 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 246GB free Firmware: SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 85 85 90 90 90 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	41.1% Average	Read 54.2 Write 76.5 Mixed 56.3 SusWrite 87.7 51% 68.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 4.5 4K Mixed 0.4 161% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 41.1% Great: 72%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 1x8GB 11,016 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	49.3% Average	MC Read 19 MC Write 16.5 MC Mixed 14 47% 16.5 GB/s	SC Read 17.8 SC Write 18.2 SC Mixed 16.3 50% 17.4 GB/s	Latency 79.2 50% 79.2 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 49.3% Great: 47%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A320M-HDV R3.0 Builds (Compare 890 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.

Gaming 29%

Raft

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 24%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV R3.0

CPU
Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 68%, 125,501 samples	195x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $183Bench 77%, 620,614 samples	124x
Ryzen 5 2400GAMD $149Bench 67%, 95,802 samples	110x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $155Bench 31%, 727,464 samples	109x
RX 580AMD $220Bench 55%, 659,180 samples	85x
RX 570AMD $125Bench 47%, 305,992 samples	81x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $32Bench 67%, 275,230 samples	55x
A400 120GBKingston $25Bench 60%, 124,895 samples	43x
SU650 240GBAdata $49Bench 65%, 35,081 samples	16x

RAM
Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $77Bench 85%, 114,594 samples	23x
1x8GBAdataBench 39%, 20,465 samples	17x
F4 DDR4 2400 C17 1x8GBG.SKILLBench 43%, 398 samples	15x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $368

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-10600K $224	Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400	Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-10400F $148	Nvidia RTX 3070 $500	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-10700K $320	Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $49

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $73	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16