Asus H110M-A/M.2

Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	32% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	20.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus H110M-A/M.2 (all builds)
Memory	2.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161227
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 29 '19 at 19:31
Run Duration	148 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	56%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7500-$89 149,467 User benchmarks, average bench 67% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	69.1% Good	Memory 72.3 1-Core 113 2-Core 178 70% 121 Pts	4-Core 400 8-Core 282 48% 342 Pts	64-Core 348 22% 348 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 69.1% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 8C96) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	32% Below average	Lighting 40.5 Reflection 31 Parallax 40.9 33% 37.5 fps	MRender 37.4 Gravity 37.6 Splatting 36 30% 37 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 32% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$32 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 48GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK71E0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 80 2.6 49 54 28 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	20.4% Poor	Read 178 Write 87.5 Mixed 73.5 SusWrite 37.8 21% 94.1 MB/s	4K Read 11.4 4K Write 16.8 4K Mixed 3.2 30% 10.5 MB/s	DQ Read 110 DQ Write 0.9 DQ Mixed 0.7 14% 37.3 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 20.4% Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 432GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 163 157 163 163 165 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	98.7% Outstanding	Read 182 Write 170 Mixed 76 SusWrite 163 108% 147 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 149% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 98.7% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2133 C15 2x4GB 247 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	55.9% Above average	MC Read 17.4 MC Write 24.9 MC Mixed 18.5 58% 20.3 GB/s	SC Read 9.7 SC Write 16.7 SC Mixed 18.2 42% 14.9 GB/s	Latency 96.2 42% 96.2 ns
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 55.9% Great: 75%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110M-A/M.2 Builds (Compare 3,112 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 42%

Speed boat

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 34%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus H110M-A/M.2

CPU
Core i5-7500Intel $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples	392x
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	381x
Core i5-7400Intel $110Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	352x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	399x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	345x
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	217x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	115x
SSDNow UV400 240GBKingston $89Bench 71%, 105,079 samples	114x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	69x

RAM
9905678-012.A00G 2x8GBKingstonBench 73%, 1,882 samples	55x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	53x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GBCorsair $46Bench 69%, 47,721 samples	49x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 94% - Outstanding

Total price: $234

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16