| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 44.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 33.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | HP xw8600 Workstation (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 0A98h |
| Memory | 28.9 GB free of 32.001 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20080924 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Apr 29 '19 at 11:01 |
| Run Duration | 142 Seconds |
| Run User | DEU-User |
| Background CPU | 100% |
PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon X5450-$299
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
|
35.4%
Below average
|
32% 53.4 Pts
|
17% 124 Pts
|
8% 126 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia Quadro P2000
Nvidia(10DE 11B3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1721 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 5GB, Driver: 390.65
|
44.4%
Average
|
44% 53.5 fps
|
44% 53.3 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125
117GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 100 105 122 96 95 MB/s
|
33.1%
Below average
|
24% 109 MB/s
|
61% 19.9 MB/s
|
58% 70.7 MB/s
|
|
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 32GB-$8
28GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 17 18 12 9.7 MB/s
|
14.9%
Very poor
|
27% 21.5 MB/s
|
180% 2.87 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 65GB
null MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 33792 MB
|
13.3%
Very poor
|
13% 4.43 GB/s
|
9% 3.13 GB/s
|
24% 167 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical xw8600 Workstation Builds (Compare 164 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: HP xw8600 Workstation
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| CPU: Intel Xeon X54501stBench 47%, 826 samples | 21x |
| CPU: Intel Xeon X54501stBench 47%, 324 samples | 17x |
| Xeon X5450Intel $299Bench 50%, 5,870 samples | 12x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 9x |
| Quadro FX 5600NvidiaBench 6%, 254 samples | 9x |
| GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 8x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 47% - Average | Total price: $145 |