HP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-ce0xx

Performance Results


Gaming 76% Battleship	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 62% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	91.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	200% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (96%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	HP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-ce0xx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 8390
Memory	11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181109
Uptime	2.2 Days
Run Date	Apr 28 '19 at 19:42
Run Duration	139 Seconds
Run User	SAU-User
Background CPU	96%

Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 473,208 User benchmarks, average bench 62% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	78.7% Very good	Memory 89.8 1-Core 103 2-Core 207 77% 133 Pts	4-Core 372 8-Core 494 55% 433 Pts	64-Core 552 34% 552 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 78.7% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200 478,117 User benchmarks, average bench 104% Gigabyte(1458 37D5) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.39 Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	91.7% Outstanding	Lighting 112 Reflection 104 Parallax 127 91% 114 fps	MRender 145 Gravity 112 Splatting 91.5 92% 116 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 91.7% Great: 112%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB 99,566 User benchmarks, average bench 177% 128GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXB73H1Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 481 317 319 319 307 249 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	200% Outstanding	Read 1,731 Write 1,246 Mixed 775 SusWrite 332 226% 1,021 MB/s	4K Read 53.3 4K Write 108 4K Mixed 64.4 221% 75.3 MB/s	DQ Read 1,082 DQ Write 794 DQ Mixed 857 662% 911 MB/s
Poor: 106% ↑ This bench: 200% Great: 236%
Hitachi HTS721010A9E630 2TB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 1TB free Firmware: SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 107 109 110 110 112 MB/s Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive		Read 68.7 Write 49.5 Mixed 66 SusWrite 108 54% 73.1 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 4.4 4K Mixed 0.7 209% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 42% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HP26D4S9S8MH-8 2x8GB 2,916 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (72^nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	75.2% Very good	MC Read 29.2 MC Write 29.1 MC Mixed 22.3 77% 26.9 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 26.2 SC Mixed 23 61% 21.4 GB/s	Latency 67.5 59% 67.5 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 75.2% Great: 81%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical OMEN by HP Laptop 15-ce0xx Builds (Compare 3,337 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: HP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-ce0xx

CPU
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	2,371x
Core i5-7300HQIntelBench 57%, 170,871 samples	965x
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 72%, 1 sample	1x

GPU
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples	1,350x
GTX 1060 (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 43%, 36,643 samples	785x
GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 23%, 160,694 samples	778x

SSD
MZVLW128HEGR-000H1 128GBSamsungBench 176%, 8,655 samples	293x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 177%, 99,566 samples	273x
CA1-8D128-HP 128GBLiteonBench 117%, 4,097 samples	158x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples	350x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 62,266 samples	308x
HP26D4S9S8MH-8 2x8GBKingstonBench 70%, 2,916 samples	191x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16