Gigabyte GA-P55-UD4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics108% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive59.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-P55-UD4  (all builds)
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.5 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100625
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 28 '19 at 07:55
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7 860-$280
Socket 1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.15 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
75.4% Very good
Memory 95.9
1-Core 77.7
2-Core 159
69% 111 Pts
4-Core 304
8-Core 398
46% 351 Pts
64-Core 397
27% 397 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$520
Nvidia(10DE 1B80) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.39
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
108% Outstanding
Lighting 316
Reflection 367
Parallax 432
83% 372 fps
MRender 239
Gravity 414
Splatting 251
110% 301 fps
Poor: 78%
This bench: 108%
Great: 116%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 275GB-$160
140GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR070
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 130 130 130 133 129 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
59.7% Above average
Read 261
Write 208
Mixed 237
SusWrite 130
47% 209 MB/s
4K Read 23.9
4K Write 50.9
4K Mixed 32.6
105% 35.8 MB/s
DQ Read 192
DQ Write 187
DQ Mixed 159
128% 180 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 94%
Origin Inception TLC830 Series 1TB
338GB free
Firmware: R0427A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 139 134 138 139 138 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
68.6% Good
Read 261
Write 242
Mixed 230
SusWrite 137
49% 217 MB/s
4K Read 30.1
4K Write 62.8
4K Mixed 40.2
130% 44.4 MB/s
DQ Read 207
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 178
140% 194 MB/s
Poor: 95%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 117%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$65
177GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 55 54 52 52 54 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
8.56% Terrible
Read 78
Write 79.3
Mixed 80.2
SusWrite 50.5
16% 72 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 7.9
4K Mixed 1.6
8% 3.53 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 8.56%
Great: 126%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$49
108GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 73 72 73 75 75 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
43% Average
Read 76.2
Write 74.8
Mixed 54
SusWrite 73.3
51% 69.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
182% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 43%
Great: 74%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$49
102GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 62 62 63 63 63 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
34.4% Below average
Read 57.3
Write 59.8
Mixed 48
SusWrite 62.3
42% 56.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 74%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$93
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 116 116 118 118 119 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
72.4% Very good
Read 137
Write 77
Mixed 77.5
SusWrite 115
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.9
189% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45.8% Average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 14.6
MC Mixed 13
44% 15.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.5
SC Write 11.1
SC Mixed 12.8
34% 11.8 GB/s
Latency 54.4
74% 54.4 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 90%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical GA-P55-UD4 Builds (Compare 311 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-P55-UD4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 42% - Average Total price: $760
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $195Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9400F $156Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $510Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $56
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $47Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $67SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $70SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback