Asus P5K SE/EPU

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
-
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 17.5%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.92% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
MotherboardAsus P5K SE/EPU  (all builds)
Memory0.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20080618
Uptime17.5 Days
Run DateApr 27 '19 at 11:16
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 40%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core2 Duo E8400-$20
LGA775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
17.5% Very poor
SC Int 70.5
SC Float 41.5
SC Mixed 53.4
44% 55.1 Pts
QC Int 113
QC Float 65.3
QC Mixed 40.2
17% 72.7 Pts
MC Int 119
MC Float 68.8
MC Mixed 81.6
14% 89.7 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 26%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5450
Asus(1043 04AF) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.92% Terrible
Lighting 2.5
Reflection 2.2
Parallax 4.4
1% 3.03 fps
MRender 1.9
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 2
1% 2.07 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.92%
Great: 2%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Goodram CX100 240GB
123GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM11.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 58 58 65 84 68 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36.6% Below average
Read 227
Write 108
Mixed 190
SusWrite 69.7
33% 149 MB/s
4K Read 21.3
4K Write 35.8
4K Mixed 14.9
70% 24 MB/s
DQ Read 22.6
DQ Write 79.2
DQ Mixed 36
32% 45.9 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 95%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$22
258GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 100 102 100 101 100 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
56.3% Above average
Read 95.8
Write 107
Mixed 66.3
SusWrite 100
68% 92.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
174% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 71%
Hitachi HDS723030ALA640 3TB
1.5TB free, PID 1011
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 26 26 26 26 25 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
15.6% Very poor
Read 34
Write 25.2
Mixed 26.7
SusWrite 25.6
37% 27.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
85% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 20%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 3TB
2.5TB free, PID 0210
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 26 26 26 26 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
16.9% Very poor
Read 32.5
Write 26
Mixed 22.2
SusWrite 25.6
35% 26.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 16.9%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
18.3% Very poor
MC Read 6.7
MC Write 6.4
MC Mixed 5.8
18% 6.3 GB/s
SC Read 4.6
SC Write 4.5
SC Mixed 3.3
12% 4.13 GB/s
Latency 138
29% 138 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 37%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

Typical P5K SE/EPU Builds (Compare 457 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P5K SE/EPU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 38% - Below average Total price: $215
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $355Nvidia GTX 1070 $335Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $84
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 $144Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $230Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $100
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X $274Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $808Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $97
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 64GB $128
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $639SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $85SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback