PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 70.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 91.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asus X99-A II (all builds) |
Memory | 26.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20161108 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Apr 26 '19 at 23:35 |
Run Duration | 141 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
77.9%
Very good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 419.67
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
70.6%
Very good
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 345 181 161 145 131 122 MB/s
|
91.6%
Outstanding
|
|||
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
160GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 412 372 316 320 317 312 MB/s
|
102%
Outstanding
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$32
465GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 161 160 159 161 161 MB/s
|
84.4%
Excellent
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 2400 C15 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
66.7%
Good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples | 694x |
Core i7-6850KIntel $115Bench 84%, 29,279 samples | 194x |
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples | 189x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 213x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 180x |
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 108x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $906 |