PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 31% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | HP Z640 Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 212A |
Memory | 18.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20170502 |
Uptime | 8.2 Days |
Run Date | Apr 26 '19 at 09:34 |
Run Duration | 121 Seconds |
Run User | IDN-User |
Background CPU | 7% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2643 v4
CPU0, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
|
81.5%
Excellent
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia Quadro M4000
HP(103C 1153) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 772 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 375.86
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
31%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WD WD5000AZLX-00K4KA0 500GB
202GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 116 105 115 114 120 MB/s
|
69.3%
Good
|
|||
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50
98GB free
Firmware: AC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 110 111 108 116 115 MB/s
|
65.8%
Good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M393A2K40BB1-CRC 2x16GB
2 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
39.5%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon E5-2620 v3IntelBench 66%, 6,890 samples | 113x |
Xeon E5-1650 v3IntelBench 77%, 7,962 samples | 100x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v31stBench 63%, 2,624 samples | 97x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples | 146x |
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples | 115x |
Quadro K4200Nvidia $820Bench 21%, 7,330 samples | 62x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 16% - Very poor | Total price: $509 |