PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 58.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 32% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-Z68MA-D2H-B3 (all builds) |
Memory | 12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores, |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20111012 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Apr 25 '19 at 23:40 |
Run Duration | 161 Seconds |
Run User | BRA-User |
Background CPU | 19% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
Socket 1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
|
74.1%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
EVGA(3842 2981) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 430.39
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
58.5%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WDC WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GB
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UJ450000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 252 16 54 5.4 20 68 MB/s
|
32%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
450GB free
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 118 117 119 117 117 MB/s
|
66.8%
Good
|
|||
Samsung HD250HJ 250GB
36GB free
Firmware: FH100-06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 98 98 97 98 98 MB/s
|
56.7%
Above average
|
|||
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
37GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 73 73 73 72 73 MB/s
|
38.5%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
659GB free
Firmware: CC24
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 112 110 111 111 111 MB/s
|
68.2%
Good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
|
48.8%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples | 180x |
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples | 115x |
Core i7-2600Intel $194Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 98x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 55x |
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 41x |
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 34x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 73% - Very good | Total price: $333 |