Asus SABERTOOTH X79

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive45.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus SABERTOOTH X79  (all builds)
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140725
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 25 '19 at 20:18
Run Duration210 Seconds
Run User CRI-User
Background CPU 25%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3930K
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
74.9% Very good
Memory 90.6
1-Core 84.9
2-Core 181
70% 119 Pts
4-Core 320
8-Core 509
51% 414 Pts
64-Core 640
40% 640 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$396
EVGA(3842 2287) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.39
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
104% Outstanding
Lighting 123
Reflection 159
Parallax 162
100% 148 fps
MRender 181
Gravity 145
Splatting 105
113% 144 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 104%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
130GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 51 68 68 55 67 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
45.3% Average
Read 341
Write 146
Mixed 186
SusWrite 60.4
40% 183 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 29.7
4K Mixed 23
77% 24.5 MB/s
DQ Read 61.5
DQ Write 121
DQ Mixed 29.2
40% 70.7 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 128%
OCZ Vertex 4 128GB-$215
24GB free
Firmware: 1.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 54 72 76 59 69 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
45.6% Average
Read 332
Write 144
Mixed 165
SusWrite 63.7
39% 176 MB/s
4K Read 19.3
4K Write 29.8
4K Mixed 22.8
74% 24 MB/s
DQ Read 108
DQ Write 124
DQ Mixed 131
94% 121 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 104%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48
82GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 87 116 122 93 113 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
61.5% Good
Read 111
Write 105
Mixed 75.5
SusWrite 103
73% 98.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
197% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 108%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48
220GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 49 66 69 54 65 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
62.3% Good
Read 158
Write 161
Mixed 97.2
SusWrite 58.8
88% 119 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.2
233% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 108%
WD WD5002AALX-00J37A0 500GB
274GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 60 82 85 65 79 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
48.7% Average
Read 97.5
Write 98
Mixed 72.5
SusWrite 72.2
63% 85.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1
173% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 72%
WD WD4005FZBX-00K5WB0 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 127 175 182 143 171 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 226
Write 218
Mixed 103
SusWrite 155
128% 176 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 6.1
4K Mixed 1.8
371% 3.1 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 110%
Great: 136%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
82% Excellent
MC Read 34.2
MC Write 33.1
MC Mixed 28.4
91% 31.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 10.5
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 66.3
60% 66.3 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 82%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SABERTOOTH X79 Builds (Compare 1,773 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH X79 - $335

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $812
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback