| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 85.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 56% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Asus P5Q-E (all builds) |
| Memory | 12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20090406 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Apr 25 '19 at 19:10 |
| Run Duration | 142 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 8% |
PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core2 Quad Q9650-$170
LGA 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
|
49.4%
Average
|
43% 66.2 Pts
|
22% 168 Pts
|
10% 168 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324
Asus(1043 868B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 419.67
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
85.3%
Excellent
|
86% 111 fps
|
83% 105 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
871GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 102 104 107 108 109 MB/s
|
56%
Above average
|
42% 186 MB/s
|
121% 39.3 MB/s
|
42% 56.4 MB/s
|
|
HGST Deskstar NAS 4TB-$60
3.5TB free
Firmware: MJAOA5E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 107 105 107 109 109 MB/s
|
74.8%
Very good
|
81% 112 MB/s
|
177% 1.4 MB/s
| |
|
HGST Deskstar NAS 4TB-$60
3.5TB free
Firmware: MJAOA5E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 163 162 157 160 162 MB/s
|
92.2%
Outstanding
|
96% 132 MB/s
|
176% 1.37 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
20.3%
Poor
|
19% 6.5 GB/s
|
16% 5.7 GB/s
|
40% 101 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P5Q-E Builds (Compare 194 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P5Q-E
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples | 55x |
| Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 18x |
| Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples | 16x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 4870ATIBench 9%, 22,563 samples | 14x |
| GeForce GT 610NvidiaBench 2%, 62,458 samples | 7x |
| GeForce GT 720NvidiaBench 4%, 15,510 samples | 6x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 52% - Above average | Total price: $189 |