Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	4.22% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	55.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7200U 205,332 User benchmarks, average bench 45% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	65% Good	Memory 84.6 1-Core 91.4 2-Core 154 66% 110 Pts	4-Core 264 8-Core 265 35% 265 Pts	64-Core 264 16% 264 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 65% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake) 387,149 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Legend(17AA 505B) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4877 Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	4.22% Terrible	Lighting 7.03 Reflection 8.81 Parallax 0.09 6% 5.31 fps	MRender 5.62 Gravity 0 Splatting 0 1% 1.87 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.22% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD9TB8W256G1001 256GB 1,158 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 91GB free (System drive) Firmware: X6105101 SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 139 154 182 133 178 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	55.5% Above average	Read 387 Write 290 Mixed 249 SusWrite 146 60% 268 MB/s	4K Read 12.9 4K Write 32.7 4K Mixed 17.5 59% 21 MB/s	DQ Read 347 DQ Write 227 DQ Mixed 256 200% 277 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 55.5% Great: 97%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB 34,316 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 12GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.4 3.9 4.3 4.1 4.6 4.2 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	13.7% Very poor	Read 26.2 Write 7.2 Mixed 6 SusWrite 4.2 11% 10.9 MB/s	4K Read 2.8 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 2.2 177% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 13.7% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 1x8GB 73,050 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (31^st percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	38.4% Below average	MC Read 14.3 MC Write 13.1 MC Mixed 11.2 37% 12.9 GB/s	SC Read 11.1 SC Write 11.5 SC Mixed 10.8 32% 11.1 GB/s	Latency 72.4 55% 72.4 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 38.4% Great: 46%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16