PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 18.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 3397 |
Memory | 4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit kolorów |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20130716 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Apr 25 '19 at 14:19 |
Run Duration | 127 Seconds |
Run User | POL-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-3570
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3570 CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
|
44.9%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 425.31
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
18.5%
Very poor
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
118GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP73
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 11 15 19 22 18 MB/s
|
9.9%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M378B5273CH0-CK0 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
54.1%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 2,465x |
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 1,462x |
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples | 797x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 1,921x |
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples | 724x |
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 487x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $87 |