PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding. |
Graphics | 35.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 92.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus PRIME Z390-P (all builds) |
Memory | 9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.2 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180921 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Apr 25 '19 at 06:53 |
Run Duration | 173 Seconds |
Run User | AUS-User |
Background CPU | 2% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-9600K-$155
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg)
|
103%
Outstanding
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 419.67
|
35.9%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial BX200 480GB-$160
160GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU02.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 289 224 75 74 75 75 MB/s
|
92.3%
Outstanding
|
|||
Samsung PM871 2.5 7mm 128GB
52GB free
Firmware: EMT02D0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 146 147 146 147 146 MB/s
|
87%
Excellent
|
|||
Seagate BUP Slim RD 1TB
233GB free
Firmware: 0304
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 15 15 16 16 16 MB/s
|
14.3%
Very poor
|
|||
WD Elements SE 25FE 1TB
811GB free, PID 25fe
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 15 15 15 16 MB/s
|
19.7%
Very poor
|
|||
SAMSUNG HN-M500MBB 500GB
76GB free, PID 0237
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 12 12 11 11 MB/s
|
13.5%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston HyperX 2133 C14 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2197 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
39%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-9700KIntel $252Bench 97%, 550,833 samples | 5,475x |
Core i5-9600KIntel $155Bench 93%, 321,194 samples | 3,162x |
Core i9-9900KIntel $410Bench 98%, 354,223 samples | 2,788x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples | 2,091x |
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 1,150x |
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples | 1,082x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 114% - Outstanding | Total price: $690 |