HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics48.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 84FD
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180807
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 25 '19 at 05:58
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 33%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$200
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
67.1% Good
Memory 88.5
1-Core 128
2-Core 222
84% 146 Pts
4-Core 259
8-Core 306
37% 283 Pts
64-Core 304
19% 304 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
HP(103C 82FC) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 419.17
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48.3% Average
Lighting 58.5
Reflection 58.8
Parallax 47.7
48% 55 fps
MRender 64.3
Gravity 59.2
Splatting 59.2
50% 60.9 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GB
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80000C00
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 702
Write 508
Mixed 562
131% 591 MB/s
4K Read 32.1
4K Write 86.6
4K Mixed 47.6
156% 55.4 MB/s
DQ Read 573
DQ Write 605
DQ Mixed 608
452% 595 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 164%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$33
214GB free
Firmware: HPH4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 123 125 125 123 125 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
68.6% Good
Read 116
Write 112
Mixed 73.5
SusWrite 124
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 112%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
562GB free, PID a202
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 121 121 121 120 121 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
45.7% Average
Read 120
Write 144
Mixed 21.3
SusWrite 120
134% 101 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
42% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP26D4U6D8ME-16X 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
48.1% Average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 15.3
48% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 12.1
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 69
58% 69 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx Builds (Compare 6,045 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer

System: HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 108% - Outstanding Total price: $343
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback