HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics49.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 84FD
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180807
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 25 '19 at 05:50
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$200
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
97.3% Outstanding
Memory 92.4
1-Core 138
2-Core 273
93% 168 Pts
4-Core 549
8-Core 925
90% 737 Pts
64-Core 1,112
69% 1,112 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 97.3%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
HP(103C 82FC) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 419.17
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49.4% Average
Lighting 59.2
Reflection 59.7
Parallax 51.5
48% 56.8 fps
MRender 65.6
Gravity 60.2
Splatting 63.2
52% 63 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GB
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80000C00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 142 130 123 96 100 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
64.2% Good
Read 196
Write 247
Mixed 179
SusWrite 123
42% 186 MB/s
4K Read 25.5
4K Write 97.5
4K Mixed 31.3
130% 51.4 MB/s
DQ Read 242
DQ Write 175
DQ Mixed 198
151% 205 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 164%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$33
214GB free
Firmware: HPH4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 132 134 135 131 134 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
72.3% Very good
Read 119
Write 38.8
Mixed 73
SusWrite 133
67% 91 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 112%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
562GB free, PID a202
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 119 121 121 121 121 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
49% Average
Read 143
Write 142
Mixed 20.7
SusWrite 120
138% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.4
39% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 49%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP26D4U6D8ME-16X 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
49.2% Average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 14.5
47% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 15.5
46% 16.1 GB/s
Latency 63.3
63% 63.3 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx Builds (Compare 6,051 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer

System: HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 108% - Outstanding Total price: $343
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback