LG A510-K.AEF9GE1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.32% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLG A510-K.AEF9GE1  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel Base Board Product Name
Memory6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110314
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 24 '19 at 20:52
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User ARE-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 M 480
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
23.2% Poor
Memory 31.7
1-Core 36.2
2-Core 65.6
26% 44.5 Pts
4-Core 87.1
8-Core 81.5
11% 84.3 Pts
64-Core 86.7
5% 86.7 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 23.2%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 310M
Device(1854 0845) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.1
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.32% Terrible
Lighting 1.37
Reflection 2.69
Parallax 0.53
1% 1.53 fps
MRender 3.43
Gravity 0.9
Splatting 2.04
2% 2.12 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.32%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB
411GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 401000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 208 200 200 200 204 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
46.5% Average
Read 208
Write 204
Mixed 195
SusWrite 202
46% 202 MB/s
4K Read 14.1
4K Write 27.3
4K Mixed 17.3
58% 19.6 MB/s
DQ Read 181
DQ Write 172
DQ Mixed 144
117% 166 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT51264BF160B.C16F 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1067 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
15.8% Very poor
MC Read 6.9
MC Write 4.8
MC Mixed 5.7
17% 5.8 GB/s
SC Read 3.5
SC Write 2.4
SC Mixed 3.5
9% 3.13 GB/s
Latency 245
16% 245 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 15.8%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback