MSI MEG X399 CREATION (MS-7B92)

Performance Results


Gaming 65% Battle cruiser	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 81% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	78.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	71.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Micro-Star MS-7B92
Motherboard	MSI MEG X399 CREATION (MS-7B92) (all builds)
Memory	110.3 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181114
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 24 '19 at 20:33
Run Duration	279 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen TR 2950X-$798 10,169 User benchmarks, average bench 81% SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	73.1% Very good	Memory 65.8 1-Core 108 2-Core 216 71% 130 Pts	4-Core 430 8-Core 863 76% 647 Pts	64-Core 2,337 145% 2,337 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 73.1% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Zotac(19DA 1445) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 419.67 Performing below potential (50^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	78.9% Very good	Lighting 97.4 Reflection 107 Parallax 101 79% 102 fps	MRender 94.8 Gravity 93.9 Splatting 96.5 78% 95.1 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 78.9% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 1 1TB 414 User benchmarks, average bench 205% 536GB free (System drive) Firmware: 9.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 88 99 99 92 97 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	71.2% Very good	Read 464 Write 472 Mixed 415 SusWrite 93.7 81% 361 MB/s	4K Read 25.4 4K Write 77.8 4K Mixed 35.8 126% 46.3 MB/s	DQ Read 126 DQ Write 230 DQ Mixed 169 131% 175 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 71.2% Great: 375%
Amd-raid Array 2 2TB 124 User benchmarks, average bench 238% 1.5TB free Firmware: 9.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 3804 3965 3987 4006 3990 3992 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	393% Outstanding	Read 2120 Write 3941 Mixed 1,666 SusWrite 3,957 664% 2,921 MB/s	4K Read 38.5 4K Write 88.5 4K Mixed 52.4 172% 59.8 MB/s	DQ Read 314 DQ Write 269 DQ Mixed 311 228% 298 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 393% Great: 468%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 216GB free Firmware: EMT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 370 374 373 373 373 373 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	86.3% Excellent	Read 437 Write 433 Mixed 384 SusWrite 372 92% 407 MB/s	4K Read 31.5 4K Write 51.9 4K Mixed 38.5 125% 40.6 MB/s	DQ Read 154 DQ Write 163 DQ Mixed 160 120% 159 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 86.3% Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 222GB free Firmware: EMT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 369 373 373 372 372 372 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	86.9% Excellent	Read 437 Write 430 Mixed 384 SusWrite 372 91% 406 MB/s	4K Read 31.9 4K Write 52.4 4K Mixed 38.9 126% 41.1 MB/s	DQ Read 160 DQ Write 168 DQ Mixed 166 124% 165 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 86.9% Great: 134%
Amd-raid Array 3 4TB 83 User benchmarks, average bench 173% 3TB free Firmware: 9.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 99 103 103 96 101 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	66.5% Good	Read 469 Write 474 Mixed 442 SusWrite 100 83% 371 MB/s	4K Read 20.4 4K Write 84.3 4K Mixed 27.7 111% 44.1 MB/s	DQ Read 130 DQ Write 218 DQ Mixed 171 131% 173 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 66.5% Great: 441%
Amd-raid Array 5 4TB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 2TB free Firmware: 9.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 69 72 75 73 74 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	57.3% Above average	Read 127 Write 109 Mixed 91.6 SusWrite 72 74% 99.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 3.7 4K Mixed 1.2 231% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 57.3% Great: 181%
Amd-raid Array 4 16TB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 115% 9.5TB free Firmware: 9.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 98 104 102 95 101 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	67.3% Good	Read 132 Write 138 Mixed 106 SusWrite 99.9 88% 119 MB/s	4K Read 3 4K Write 6 4K Mixed 1.7 425% 3.57 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 67.3% Great: 166%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2400 C15 8x16GB 30 User benchmarks, average bench 135% 8 of 8 slots used 128GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	143% Outstanding	MC Read 57.3 MC Write 59.5 MC Mixed 53.8 162% 56.9 GB/s	SC Read 17.1 SC Write 35.2 SC Mixed 24.2 73% 25.5 GB/s	Latency 112 36% 112 ns
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 143% Great: 145%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MEG X399 CREATION (MS-7B92) Builds (Compare 107 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 128%

UFO

Desktop 89%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 156%

UFO

Motherboard: MSI MEG X399 CREATION (MS-7B92)

CPU
Ryzen TR 2950XAMD $798Bench 81%, 10,169 samples	32x
Ryzen TR 2990WXAMD $790Bench 79%, 3,658 samples	31x
Ryzen TR 1950XAMD $225Bench 77%, 23,641 samples	20x

GPU
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	11x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	10x
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,306Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	8x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $76Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	10x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	9x
970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $320Bench 327%, 38,669 samples	8x

RAM
CMW32GX4M4C3200C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 93%, 29,525 samples	4x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GBCorsairBench 96%, 3,140 samples	3x
F4 DDR4 3200 C16 8x8GBG.SKILLBench 135%, 67 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $1,315

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $275	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16