Asus N752VX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics16% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemAsus N752VX  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK N752VX
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160818
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 24 '19 at 18:36
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
74.4% Very good
Memory 81.3
1-Core 109
2-Core 201
75% 131 Pts
4-Core 364
8-Core 551
57% 458 Pts
64-Core 539
33% 539 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950M
Asus(1043 10A0) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.3039
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
16% Very poor
Lighting 21.1
Reflection 16.1
Parallax 18.7
17% 18.6 fps
MRender 13.6
Gravity 21.1
Splatting 15.8
14% 16.8 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 16%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLF128HCHP-00004 128GB
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXT2301Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 69 69 61 53 49 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
46.7% Average
Read 455
Write 132
Mixed 157
SusWrite 62
44% 201 MB/s
4K Read 19
4K Write 35.5
4K Mixed 15.5
67% 23.3 MB/s
DQ Read 169
DQ Write 27.7
DQ Mixed 47.3
48% 81.4 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 56%
Crucial M500 240GB-$54
151GB free
Firmware: MU05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 270 266 274 272 270 270 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
75.6% Very good
Read 402
Write 268
Mixed 282
SusWrite 270
68% 306 MB/s
4K Read 19.9
4K Write 74.6
4K Mixed 24.1
100% 39.5 MB/s
DQ Read 303
DQ Write 262
DQ Mixed 175
161% 247 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
74.9% Very good
MC Read 27.2
MC Write 28.6
MC Mixed 23.9
76% 26.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 29.2
SC Mixed 24.3
67% 23.5 GB/s
Latency 78.2
51% 78.2 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N752VX Builds (Compare 247 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Asus N752VX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback