| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 44.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 84.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0 (all builds) |
| Memory | 5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz |
| Display | 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20190304 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Apr 24 '19 at 11:29 |
| Run Duration | 141 Seconds |
| Run User | SGP-User |
| Background CPU | 48% |
PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
58.9%
Above average
|
58% 98.9 Pts
|
34% 252 Pts
|
16% 266 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Nvidia(10DE 1320) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 430.39
|
44.8%
Average
|
47% 52.5 fps
|
40% 48.5 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Lexar SSD 240GB
202GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R1127A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 349 380 405 419 427 417 MB/s
|
84.4%
Excellent
|
86% 382 MB/s
|
114% 40.5 MB/s
|
69% 138 MB/s
|
|
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 32GB-$16
24GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 40 39 22 2.5 5.3 MB/s
|
26.4%
Poor
|
77% 66.8 MB/s
|
54% 2.17 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial CT8G4DFS824A.M8FD 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
45.7%
Average
|
46% 15.9 GB/s
|
39% 13.7 GB/s
|
43% 93.1 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical A320M-HDV R4.0 Builds (Compare 5,978 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 866x |
| Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples | 714x |
| Ryzen 5 3600AMD $84Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples | 543x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 454x |
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 423x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 402x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 92% - Outstanding | Total price: $323 |