| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 3.32% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock H110M-HDV (all builds) |
| Memory | 1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20170323 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Apr 24 '19 at 08:28 |
| Run Duration | 122 Seconds |
| Run User | ROU-User |
| Background CPU | 29% |
PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
56.7%
Above average
|
60% 93.3 Pts
|
27% 189 Pts
|
16% 251 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GeForce GT 630
MSI(1462 8A90) 1GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 385.12
|
3.32%
Terrible
|
4% 4.42 fps
|
3% 3.97 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2009)-$50
441GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 77 77 74 73 77 MB/s
|
42.5%
Average
|
39% 52.5 MB/s
|
105% 0.77 MB/s
| |
|
Samsung Spinpoint F2 1TB-$60
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1AG0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 55 81 84 85 88 MB/s
|
48.4%
Average
|
56% 77 MB/s
|
134% 1 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2400 C15 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
36.8%
Below average
|
38% 13.1 GB/s
|
22% 7.8 GB/s
|
47% 84.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H110M-HDV Builds (Compare 789 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock H110M-HDV - $92
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples | 131x |
| Core i3-6100Intel $76Bench 55%, 110,166 samples | 118x |
| Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples | 88x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 92x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 73x |
| HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples | 69x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 75% - Very good | Total price: $314 |