Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	5.17% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	56% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Samsung Samsung DeskTop System (all builds)
Motherboard	SAMSUNG SAMSUNG_DT1234567890
Memory	1.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20130727
Uptime	13 Days
Run Date	Apr 24 '19 at 02:07
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	KOR-User
Background CPU	27%

PC Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3470-$59 223,595 User benchmarks, average bench 63% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	72.4% Very good	Memory 84.7 1-Core 93.7 2-Core 178 70% 119 Pts	4-Core 353 8-Core 325 46% 339 Pts	64-Core 342 21% 342 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 72.4% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 720 15,510 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Sanyo(144D 80A8) 2GB CLim: 967 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 390.65 Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	5.17% Terrible	Lighting 6.03 Reflection 6.85 Parallax 8.62 5% 7.17 fps	MRender 4.81 Gravity 7.87 Splatting 7.65 6% 6.78 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.17% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
V-color VSS100 Series 253GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 103GB free (System drive) Firmware: N1126L SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 186 191 209 211 205 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	56% Above average	Read 246 Write 219 Mixed 198 SusWrite 198 48% 215 MB/s	4K Read 18.6 4K Write 42 4K Mixed 26.5 84% 29 MB/s	DQ Read 169 DQ Write 174 DQ Mixed 32.3 63% 125 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 56% Great: 90%
Hitachi HDS721032CLA362 320GB-$150 10,092 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 298GB free Firmware: JPFOA3GH SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 96 96 98 99 98 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	53.7% Above average	Read 90 Write 91.8 Mixed 50.5 SusWrite 97.2 60% 82.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 142% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 53.7% Great: 50%
TOSHIBA MQ01ABF050 500GB 60 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 302GB free, PID 0c31 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 33 32 34 34 34 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	17.4% Very poor	Read 32.8 Write 35.7 Mixed 22.3 SusWrite 33.4 42% 31.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 80% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 17.4% Great: 19%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5273EB0-CK0 2x4GB 1,326 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	57.1% Above average	MC Read 21.1 MC Write 21.4 MC Mixed 17.8 57% 20.1 GB/s	SC Read 15.7 SC Write 15.9 SC Mixed 16.7 46% 16.1 GB/s	Latency 72.2 55% 72.2 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 57.1% Great: 62%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	243x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	151x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	96x

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $87

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16