Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	29.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (81%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-3220-$79 71,790 User benchmarks, average bench 52% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	48.9% Average	Memory 79.1 1-Core 55 2-Core 113 52% 82.5 Pts	4-Core 111 8-Core 114 15% 112 Pts	64-Core 111 7% 111 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 48.9% Great: 62%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$29 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 90GB free (System drive) Firmware: 03090004 SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 30 49 32 23 31 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	29.7% Poor	Read 168 Write 48.4 Mixed 82.5 SusWrite 32.1 18% 82.7 MB/s	4K Read 15.1 4K Write 24.5 4K Mixed 15.4 56% 18.3 MB/s	DQ Read 126 DQ Write 46.4 DQ Mixed 90.9 66% 87.9 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 29.7% Great: 85%
Kingston DT 101 G2 8GB 2,409 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 7GB free, PID 6545 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.5 2.4 2.8 2.9 2.8 2.4 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	3.37% Terrible	Read 16.2 Write 9.5 Mixed 4.5 SusWrite 2.5 9% 8.18 MB/s	4K Read 2 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 7% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.37% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Smart SH564128FH8N6TNSQG 2x4GB 1,190 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	46.8% Average	MC Read 17 MC Write 15.5 MC Mixed 16.5 47% 16.3 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 13.3 SC Mixed 14 38% 13.3 GB/s	Latency 82.3 49% 82.3 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 46.8% Great: 59%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,139x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,040x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	820x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	455x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	424x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16