Performance Results


Gaming 36% Jet ski	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	59.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	37.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Asus Crosshair IV Formula (all builds)
Memory	11.2 GB free of 20 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20101209
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Apr 23 '19 at 21:48
Run Duration	149 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T-$240 23,506 User benchmarks, average bench 57% AM3, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	57.7% Above average	Memory 80.4 1-Core 47.5 2-Core 100 49% 76 Pts	4-Core 198 8-Core 244 28% 221 Pts	64-Core 295 18% 295 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 57.7% Great: 64%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Gigabyte(1458 3739) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 419.17 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	59.9% Above average	Lighting 72.6 Reflection 80.5 Parallax 69.7 59% 74.3 fps	MRender 72.3 Gravity 74.5 Splatting 76.7 61% 74.5 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 59.9% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 53GB free (System drive) Firmware: ME0T SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 106 106 102 103 93 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	37.8% Below average	Read 96.5 Write 102 Mixed 99.8 SusWrite 102 23% 100 MB/s	4K Read 15.9 4K Write 38.4 4K Mixed 28.4 81% 27.6 MB/s	DQ Read 30.2 DQ Write 51.2 DQ Mixed 31.3 26% 37.6 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 37.8% Great: 124%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 56GB free Firmware: EXT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 298 49 50 49 48 46 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	85.3% Excellent	Read 417 Write 372 Mixed 331 SusWrite 90.1 68% 303 MB/s	4K Read 40.2 4K Write 87.5 4K Mixed 48.3 169% 58.7 MB/s	DQ Read 257 DQ Write 225 DQ Mixed 179 151% 220 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 85.3% Great: 118%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 32GB 421 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 14GB free, PID a815 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9 8.4 9.4 9.5 11 10 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	6.37% Terrible	Read 21.5 Write 5 Mixed 6 SusWrite 9.5 12% 10.5 MB/s	4K Read 5 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 18% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 6.37% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F3-12800CL9-2GBRL0 F3-12800CL9-2GBRL0 BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 20GB 667, 667, 667, 667 MHz 2048, 2048, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	31.3% Below average	MC Read 13.4 MC Write 6.8 MC Mixed 12.1 31% 10.8 GB/s	SC Read 6.3 SC Write 5.8 SC Mixed 8.5 20% 6.87 GB/s	Latency 79.7 50% 79.7 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 32%

Sail boat

Desktop 65%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 25%

Raft

CPU
Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples	120x
Phenom II X6 1100TAMD $340Bench 59%, 12,769 samples	34x
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	31x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	8x
F3-16000CL9-2GBRH F3-16000CL9-2GBRH F3-16000CL9-2GBRH F3-16000CL9-2GBRH 8GBUnknownBench 39%, 26 samples	5x
F3-10666CL9-4GBRL F3-10666CL9-4GBRL 8GBUnknownBench 44%, 282 samples	5x

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $520

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16