| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 3.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 60.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| System | Fujitsu CELSIUS H720 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | FUJITSU FJNB257 |
| Memory | 2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colori, |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20140114 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Apr 23 '19 at 15:43 |
| Run Duration | 144 Seconds |
| Run User | ITA-User |
| Background CPU | 0% |
PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-3520M
Onboard, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
|
62.3%
Good
|
69% 117 Pts
|
32% 237 Pts
|
15% 236 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Fujitsu(10CF 16C1) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
|
3.88%
Terrible
|
4% 3.87 fps
|
4% 4.9 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung MZ7TY256HDHP-000L7 256GB
166GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT04L6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 208 218 221 223 215 MB/s
|
60.9%
Good
|
50% 222 MB/s
|
93% 30.2 MB/s
|
148% 197 MB/s
|
|
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2009)-$50
394GB free
Firmware: 01.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 71 72 72 69 74 MB/s
|
39.5%
Below average
|
46% 62.4 MB/s
|
117% 0.9 MB/s
| |
|
SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 16GB-$8
11GB free, PID 5591
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 14 9.9 10 10 10 MB/s
|
24.5%
Poor
|
50% 44.1 MB/s
|
222% 3.93 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Micron 16JTF51264HZ-1G4M1 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
|
28.8%
Poor
|
26% 8.97 GB/s
|
27% 9.53 GB/s
|
54% 73.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical CELSIUS H720 Builds (Compare 77 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Fujitsu CELSIUS H720
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-3720QMIntel $100Bench 65%, 9,911 samples | 43x |
| Core i7-3520MIntelBench 53%, 19,660 samples | 7x |
| Core i7-3610QMIntel $300Bench 62%, 38,575 samples | 7x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples | 47x |
| Quadro K1000MNvidiaBench 3%, 4,204 samples | 25x |
| Quadro K2000MNvidiaBench 6%, 4,288 samples | 4x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 86% - Excellent | Total price: $100 |