| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 22% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 60.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| System | Micro-Star GS65 Stealth Thin 8RF |
| Motherboard | MSI MS-16Q2 (all builds) |
| Memory | 6.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
| Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20180827 |
| Uptime | 6.9 Days |
| Run Date | Apr 23 '19 at 10:32 |
| Run Duration | 112 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 35% |
PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
|
77.7%
Very good
|
69% 125 Pts
|
67% 537 Pts
|
48% 781 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile Max-Q)
MSI(1462 1227) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.1935
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
22%
Poor
|
16% 27.8 fps
|
33% 37.6 fps
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
71.1%
Very good
|
74% 25.8 GB/s
|
57% 19.9 GB/s
|
45% 88.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical MS-16Q2 Builds (Compare 1,184 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: MSI MS-16Q2
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples | 1,174x |
| Core i9-8950HKIntelBench 74%, 14,729 samples | 8x |
| Core i9-11900KIntelBench 67%, 3 samples | 2x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples | 587x |
| GTX 1070 (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 61%, 9,069 samples | 430x |
| GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples | 154x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |