| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 19.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 97.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| System | Micro-Star MS-7A36 |
| Motherboard | MSI A320M PRO-E (MS-7A36) (all builds) |
| Memory | 5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20190122 |
| Uptime | 0.4 Days |
| Run Date | Apr 23 '19 at 08:21 |
| Run Duration | 127 Seconds |
| Run User | TUR-User |
| Background CPU | 0% |
PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
70.1%
Very good
|
69% 122 Pts
|
52% 398 Pts
|
27% 430 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
19.4%
Very poor
|
18% 27.3 fps
|
23% 27.6 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
173GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 311 308 305 311 313 310 MB/s
|
97.5%
Outstanding
|
91% 407 MB/s
|
144% 53.9 MB/s
|
213% 314 MB/s
|
|
Samsung HD200HJ 200GB
82GB free
Firmware: KF100-06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 91 91 90 91 89 MB/s
|
45.8%
Average
|
44% 60.3 MB/s
|
125% 0.83 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 2133 C15 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (97th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
43.4%
Average
|
42% 14.5 GB/s
|
44% 15.5 GB/s
|
43% 93.1 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical A320M PRO-E (MS-7A36) Builds (Compare 722 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: MSI A320M PRO-E (MS-7A36)
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples | 153x |
| Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 150x |
| Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $120Bench 74%, 142,983 samples | 58x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 89x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 64x |
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 46x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 81% - Excellent | Total price: $234 |