AZW Gemini J45

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 30% Sail boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	51.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	AZW Gemini J45 (all builds)
Motherboard	Default Default string
Memory	4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181224
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 23 '19 at 06:55
Run Duration	168 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	62%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium J4205 1,095 User benchmarks, average bench 33% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	30.9% Below average	Memory 35.2 1-Core 45.8 2-Core 82.5 32% 54.5 Pts	4-Core 153 8-Core 160 21% 156 Pts	64-Core 165 10% 165 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 30.9% Great: 40%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 7,629 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Intel(8086 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4974 Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	1.05% Terrible	Lighting 1.63 Reflection 2.23 Parallax 1.94 1% 1.93 fps	MRender 0.05 Gravity 1.9 Splatting 0.09 0% 0.68 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.05% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
128gb SSD 128GB 1,031 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 99GB free (System drive) Firmware: V3.36 SusWrite @10s intervals: 229 271 302 118 107 106 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	51.2% Above average	Read 338 Write 320 Mixed 245 SusWrite 189 61% 273 MB/s	4K Read 20.7 4K Write 43.5 4K Mixed 12.6 70% 25.6 MB/s	DQ Read 95.6 DQ Write 149 DQ Mixed 26.1 47% 90.3 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 51.2% Great: 152%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 64GB-$9 17,023 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 47GB free, PID 5581 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 48 35 24 26 25 MB/s Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 140 Write 51 Mixed 67.3 SusWrite 34.3 84% 73.1 MB/s	4K Read 4.2 4K Mixed 1 74% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 39%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB 3,115 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 595GB free, PID 0200 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 68 68 67 66 67 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	30.8% Below average	Read 100 Write 95.4 Mixed 7.9 SusWrite 67.4 85% 67.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.6 39% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 30.8% Great: 44%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 32GB 7,326 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 26GB free, PID 6544 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.4 6.2 6.2 6.2 6 5.9 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	4.53% Terrible	Read 15.9 Write 2.2 Mixed 3.7 SusWrite 6 7% 6.95 MB/s	4K Read 3.9 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 14% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.53% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x2GB 5,869 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	26.9% Poor	MC Read 8.8 MC Write 13.3 MC Mixed 9.7 30% 10.6 GB/s	SC Read 2.9 SC Write 4.3 SC Mixed 3.7 10% 3.63 GB/s	Latency 226 18% 226 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 26.9% Great: 29%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Gemini J45 Builds (Compare 17 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 33%

Sail boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

System: AZW Gemini J45

CPU
Pentium J4205IntelBench 33%, 1,095 samples	13x
Pentium J4205IntelBench 35%, 25 samples	4x

GPU
HD GraphicsIntelBench 2%, 7,629 samples	12x
HD Graphics 505IntelBench 2%, 2,850 samples	5x

SSD
128GB 128GBSSDBench 65%, 7,332 samples	4x
256GB 256GBSSDBench 77%, 9,229 samples	3x
128G 128GBSSDBench 57%, 241 samples	2x

RAM
1x8GBABBench 23%, 55 samples	8x
123456789012345678 4x2GBABCDBench 24%, 5,869 samples	7x
123456789012345678 AB 4GBABCDBench 17%, 200 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16