| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 3.27% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 26.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
| System | Toshiba Satellite U840 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Type2 Type2 - Board Product Name1 |
| Memory | 4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20120502 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Apr 23 '19 at 01:42 |
| Run Duration | 143 Seconds |
| Run User | BRA-User |
| Background CPU | 4% |
PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-3317U-$225
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz
|
56%
Above average
|
56% 88.8 Pts
|
22% 165 Pts
|
10% 167 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Toshiba(1179 FBA1) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2712
|
3.27%
Terrible
|
3% 3.61 fps
|
4% 4.67 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 580A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 23 23 24 24 24 MB/s
|
26.6%
Poor
|
27% 127 MB/s
|
33% 7.33 MB/s
| |
|
SanDisk X100 mSATA 32GB
11GB free
Firmware: 10.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 86 85 81 81 81 MB/s
|
38.9%
Below average
|
30% 137 MB/s
|
63% 22.3 MB/s
|
52% 72 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Expansion 2TB
792GB free, PID 231a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 57 57 59 62 62 MB/s
|
22.5%
Poor
|
75% 50.8 MB/s
|
68% 0.93 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CK0 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
55.1%
Above average
|
56% 19.7 GB/s
|
40% 14.1 GB/s
|
54% 73.6 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Satellite U840 Builds (Compare 15 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Toshiba Satellite U840
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-2467MIntelBench 45%, 4,235 samples | 6x |
| Core i5-3317UIntel $225Bench 47%, 26,848 samples | 5x |
| Core i3-2377MIntelBench 44%, 962 samples | 3x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples | 9x |
| HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples | 6x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |