PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 56.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
Motherboard | Asrock B360 Pro4 (all builds) |
Memory | 4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores |
OS | Windows 8.1 |
BIOS Date | 20190313 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Apr 22 '19 at 23:58 |
Run Duration | 151 Seconds |
Run User | PER-User |
Background CPU | 7% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-9400F-$102
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
|
87%
Excellent
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
CLim: 1564 MHz, MLim: 2052 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.36
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
56.4%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
182GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 351 322 312 320 321 317 MB/s
|
101%
Outstanding
|
|||
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
76GB free
Firmware: 17.01H17
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 112 109 113 113 111 MB/s
|
61.8%
Good
|
|||
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
78GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 169 164 170 169 165 MB/s
|
97.1%
Outstanding
|
|||
Maxtor STM3160215AS 160GB
22GB free
Firmware: 4.AAB
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 58 56 56 57 55 MB/s
|
33%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
38.2%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples | 181x |
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples | 138x |
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 75x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 89x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 41x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 37x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 106% - Outstanding | Total price: $417 |