| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 3.73% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 75.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
| System | Fujitsu ESPRIMO P400 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | FUJITSU D2990-A1 |
| Memory | 1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, , |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20111122 |
| Uptime | 0.3 Days |
| Run Date | Apr 22 '19 at 16:03 |
| Run Duration | 127 Seconds |
| Run User | HUN-User |
| Background CPU | 1% |
PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
63.5%
Good
|
67% 111 Pts
|
28% 208 Pts
|
13% 208 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GeForce GT 430
Gigabyte(1458 3505) 1GB
CLim: 730 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
|
3.73%
Terrible
|
4% 4.53 fps
|
4% 4.71 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
405GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 240 241 229 224 221 233 MB/s
|
75.4%
Very good
|
54% 239 MB/s
|
135% 43.7 MB/s
|
149% 199 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$32
37GB free
Firmware: JC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 84 93 96 89 79 MB/s
|
46.8%
Average
|
54% 73.2 MB/s
|
172% 1.13 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Micron 8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 Samsung M378B5773CH0-CH9 4GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
|
48.9%
Average
|
47% 16.6 GB/s
|
42% 14.5 GB/s
|
62% 64.5 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical ESPRIMO P400 Builds (Compare 628 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Fujitsu ESPRIMO P400
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-2320Intel $165Bench 64%, 38,345 samples | 103x |
| Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 79x |
| Core i3-2120Intel $170Bench 51%, 77,810 samples | 61x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 162x |
| HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 37x |
| GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 33x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 66% - Good | Total price: $193 |