Performance Results


Gaming 117% UFO	Desktop 97% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 100% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	124% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	92.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus TUF Z390M-PRO GAMING (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180921
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 22 '19 at 03:18
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	15%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$412 354,223 User benchmarks, average bench 98% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	95.1% Outstanding	Memory 93 1-Core 158 2-Core 283 99% 178 Pts	4-Core 523 8-Core 792 82% 658 Pts	64-Core 774 48% 774 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 95.1% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$407 316,424 User benchmarks, average bench 124% EVGA(3842 2182) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 425.31 Performing below potential (50^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	124% Outstanding	Lighting 169 Reflection 157 Parallax 175 138% 167 fps	MRender 185 Gravity 145 Splatting 106 115% 145 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 124% Great: 134%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 750GB-$160 24,471 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 136GB free (System drive) Firmware: M0CR040 SusWrite @10s intervals: 428 410 346 366 364 303 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	92.2% Outstanding	Read 412 Write 421 Mixed 345 SusWrite 370 87% 387 MB/s	4K Read 22.2 4K Write 86.8 4K Mixed 34.5 124% 47.8 MB/s	DQ Read 357 DQ Write 316 DQ Mixed 335 252% 336 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 92.2% Great: 104%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 55GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 142 133 149 133 145 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	91.6% Outstanding	Read 178 Write 157 Mixed 109 SusWrite 141 108% 146 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 1.2 241% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 91.6% Great: 109%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 16GB 33,521 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 15GB free, PID 5575 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.1 4.4 4.4 3.2 4.2 4.2 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	6.93% Terrible	Read 23.7 Write 4 Mixed 5.5 SusWrite 4.1 9% 9.32 MB/s	4K Read 8.4 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.4 52% 3 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 6.93% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$37 287,720 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	67.5% Good	MC Read 27.1 MC Write 24.4 MC Mixed 18.8 67% 23.4 GB/s	SC Read 17.5 SC Write 22.8 SC Mixed 21.7 59% 20.7 GB/s	Latency 62.1 64% 62.1 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 67.5% Great: 109%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 104%

UFO

Desktop 100%

UFO

Workstation 96%

Nuclear submarine

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	58x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	52x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	49x

RAM
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $63Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	32x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	26x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 93%, 89,024 samples	26x

Value: 110% - Outstanding

Total price: $558

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16