Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 44% Speed boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	3.12% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	39.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-5745M APU 6,689 User benchmarks, average bench 36% Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	44.8% Average	Memory 67.6 1-Core 49.1 2-Core 84.8 43% 67.2 Pts	4-Core 128 8-Core 134 18% 131 Pts	64-Core 129 8% 129 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 44.8% Great: 44%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8610G 5,188 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Dell(1028 0621) 768MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1101.0 Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	3.12% Terrible	Lighting 5.8 Reflection 6.54 Parallax 5.53 5% 5.96 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.12% Great: 5%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 1000GB 44,528 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 845GB free (System drive) Firmware: UH5100RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 3 52 76 61 191 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	39.8% Below average	Read 370 Write 306 Mixed 267 SusWrite 83.3 57% 257 MB/s	4K Read 15.4 4K Write 26.2 4K Mixed 11.3 52% 17.6 MB/s	DQ Read 112 DQ Write 87 DQ Mixed 23.7 38% 74.3 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 39.8% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8KTF51264HZ-1G6E1 2x4GB 14,177 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	23.8% Poor	MC Read 10.4 MC Write 4.9 MC Mixed 8.6 23% 7.97 GB/s	SC Read 6.2 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 8 18% 6.4 GB/s	Latency 107 37% 107 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 23.8% Great: 57%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 38%

Jet ski

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

CPU
A8-5545M APUAMDBench 36%, 2,749 samples	17x
A10-5745M APUAMDBench 36%, 6,689 samples	12x

GPU
Radeon HD 8510GAMDBench 3%, 2,125 samples	17x
Radeon HD 8610GAMDBench 4%, 5,188 samples	12x

SSD
335 Series 180GBIntel $169Bench 73%, 2,872 samples	1x
Ultra II 480GBSanDisk $39Bench 86%, 62,883 samples	1x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	1x

RAM
M471B5173DB0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 47%, 26,681 samples	6x
NT4GC64C88B1NS-DI 2x4GBNanyaBench 48%, 762 samples	5x
M471B5173QH0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 30,873 samples	5x

Value: 5% - Terrible

Total price: $169

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16