Asrock A320M-HDV R3.0

Performance Results


Gaming 38% Jet ski	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 35% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	44.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	83.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.

Run History

21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asrock A320M-HDV R3.0 (all builds)
Memory	5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181005
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 21 '19 at 18:21
Run Duration	124 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$180 558,833 User benchmarks, average bench 77% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	78.3% Very good	Memory 80.2 1-Core 109 2-Core 212 77% 134 Pts	4-Core 410 8-Core 678 69% 544 Pts	64-Core 856 58% 856 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 78.3% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$218 623,105 User benchmarks, average bench 55% MSI(1462 8A92) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.4.1 Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	44.6% Average	Lighting 53.8 Reflection 69.1 Parallax 69.2 44% 64.1 fps	MRender 67.6 Gravity 54.7 Splatting 57 46% 59.7 fps
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 44.6% Great: 61%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Gigabyte UD PRO 512GB-$76 2,371 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 210GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM13.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 331 177 94 122 236 236 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	83.8% Excellent	Read 502 Write 451 Mixed 396 SusWrite 199 87% 387 MB/s	4K Read 27 4K Write 61.8 4K Mixed 32.9 116% 40.6 MB/s	DQ Read 347 DQ Write 360 DQ Mixed 189 188% 299 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 83.8% Great: 106%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB 49,265 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 338GB free Firmware: SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 98 96 99 99 98 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	50.9% Above average	Read 79 Write 105 Mixed 65 SusWrite 97.1 64% 86.5 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 4.7 4K Mixed 0.7 223% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 50.9% Great: 72%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 1x8GB 10,933 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	49.6% Average	MC Read 19 MC Write 17 MC Mixed 14.1 48% 16.7 GB/s	SC Read 17.8 SC Write 17.9 SC Mixed 16.3 50% 17.3 GB/s	Latency 80.1 50% 80.1 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 49.6% Great: 47%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A320M-HDV R3.0 Builds (Compare 820 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.

Gaming 29%

Raft

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 24%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV R3.0

CPU
Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 69%, 129,180 samples	184x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $180Bench 77%, 558,833 samples	116x
Ryzen 5 2400GAMD $149Bench 67%, 94,763 samples	97x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $155Bench 31%, 724,497 samples	98x
RX 580AMD $218Bench 55%, 623,105 samples	77x
RX 570AMD $125Bench 47%, 296,565 samples	72x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $32Bench 66%, 271,645 samples	51x
A400 120GBKingston $25Bench 61%, 116,034 samples	42x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $70Bench 105%, 768,156 samples	15x

RAM
Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $70Bench 84%, 112,708 samples	22x
F4 DDR4 2400 C17 1x8GBG.SKILLBench 43%, 392 samples	14x
F4 DDR4 3000 C16 1x8GBG.SKILLBench 43%, 14,487 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $361

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-10600K $257	Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400	Crucial MX500 250GB $47
Intel Core i5-9600K $219	Nvidia RTX 3070 $500	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10400F $161	Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $40

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $71	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16