Dell PowerEdge T410

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics25.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive33.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell PowerEdge T410
MotherboardDell PowerEdge T410  (all builds)
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130730
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateApr 21 '19 at 11:17
Run Duration187 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X5560
CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
64.1% Good
Memory 88
1-Core 76.1
2-Core 130
61% 98 Pts
4-Core 222
8-Core 305
33% 263 Pts
64-Core 270
17% 270 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Gigabyte(1458 3766) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 419.35
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25.2% Poor
Lighting 30.3
Reflection 24.2
Parallax 29.9
25% 28.1 fps
MRender 36.5
Gravity 29.6
Splatting 30.6
26% 32.2 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 25.2%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 500GB
196GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 118 120 122 123 123 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
33.2% Below average
Read 117
Write 118
Mixed 102
SusWrite 120
26% 114 MB/s
4K Read 9.8
4K Write 27
4K Mixed 18.7
53% 18.5 MB/s
DQ Read 99.1
DQ Write 88
DQ Mixed 77.7
63% 88.3 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 118%
WD WD2502ABYS-18B7A0 250GB
22GB free
Firmware: 3B04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 101 101 102 101 102 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
56.1% Above average
Read 93.8
Write 94.2
Mixed 63.2
SusWrite 102
65% 88.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
166% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 64%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65
83GB free
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 59 60 61 61 61 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
41.7% Average
Read 84.3
Write 83.8
Mixed 64.3
SusWrite 60.6
54% 73.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
158% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 57%
WD WD30EZRZ-00Z 2TB
86GB free
Firmware: 0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 116 120 122 123 123 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
65.7% Good
Read 108
Write 105
Mixed 63.5
SusWrite 120
73% 99.3 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
199% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 73%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65
82GB free
Firmware: 0A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 94 96 95 97 95 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
51.4% Above average
Read 84.3
Write 80.5
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 95.1
58% 78.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.8
131% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 57%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB
25GB free, PID 5567, Sandisk Cruzer
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.8 4 4.5 3.3 3.8 4.6 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
16.1% Very poor
Read 33
Write 3
Mixed 12
SusWrite 4
13% 13 MB/s
4K Read 6.3
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.1
159% 3.43 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M393B5673DZ1-CF8 4x2GB
4 of 8 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
30.9% Below average
MC Read 9.8
MC Write 10.9
MC Mixed 9.9
29% 10.2 GB/s
SC Read 4.3
SC Write 7.6
SC Mixed 10.8
22% 7.57 GB/s
Latency 69.6
58% 69.6 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 36%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PowerEdge T410 Builds (Compare 41 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell PowerEdge T410

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback