Gigabyte GA-H270-Gaming 3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
-
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.2%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.3% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H270-Gaming 3  (all builds)
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170424
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateApr 21 '19 at 07:22
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Pentium G4400-$50
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
45.2% Average
SC Int 89.5
SC Float 103
SC Mixed 95.7
77% 96.1 Pts
QC Int 157
QC Float 199
QC Mixed 182
41% 179 Pts
MC Int 149
MC Float 204
MC Mixed 182
27% 178 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Gigabyte(1458 365B) 2GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
4.3% Terrible
Lighting 12.8
Reflection 13.1
Parallax 11.1
4% 12.3 fps
MRender 12.2
Gravity 12.9
Splatting 7.1
5% 10.7 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.3%
Great: 9%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Adata SU650 240GB-$49
172GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0831C0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 255 11 105 92 23 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
36.7% Below average
Read 439
Write 328
Mixed 351
SusWrite 111
68% 307 MB/s
4K Read 20.3
4K Write 10.3
4K Mixed 0.6
37% 10.4 MB/s
DQ Read 102
DQ Write 10.8
DQ Mixed 0.7
15% 37.7 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 106%
Hitachi HUA723020ALA641 2TB-$78
440GB free
Firmware: MK7OA840
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 135 138 137 138 138 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
77.2% Very good
Read 132
Write 134
Mixed 77
SusWrite 137
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
163% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 83%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$107
566GB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 169 170 173 173 174 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
85.9% Excellent
Read 128
Write 121
Mixed 22.3
SusWrite 172
80% 111 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
168% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2400 C15 4x4GB-$110
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled
71.7% Very good
MC Read 22.5
MC Write 28.6
MC Mixed 24.5
72% 25.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 29.4
SC Mixed 22.6
65% 22.6 GB/s
Latency 72.2
55% 72.2 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 104%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

Typical GA-H270-Gaming 3 Builds (Compare 3,207 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H270-Gaming 3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $651
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $350Nvidia GTX 1070 $335Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $101
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 $144Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $230Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $100
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X $280Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $808Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $97
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 64GB $45
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $646SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $75SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback