Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K5-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics31.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemGigabyte AX370-Gaming K5
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K5-CF  (all builds)
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190418
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 20 '19 at 18:48
Run Duration215 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$137
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
70.5% Very good
Memory 73.9
1-Core 100
2-Core 173
69% 116 Pts
4-Core 360
8-Core 595
60% 478 Pts
64-Core 814
55% 814 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Nvidia(10DE 116F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 425.31
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
31.4% Below average
Lighting 130
Reflection 110
Parallax 119
34% 120 fps
MRender 78.5
Gravity 115
Splatting 78
31% 90.6 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 35%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$160
136GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 5,085
Write 3,356
Mixed 3,859
909% 4,100 MB/s
4K Read 213
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 131
558% 157 MB/s
DQ Read 643
DQ Write 359
DQ Mixed 515
379% 506 MB/s
Poor: 75% Great: 124%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$83
181GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 994 503 289 290 290 290 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
167% Outstanding
Read 999
Write 1,290
Mixed 932
SusWrite 443
206% 916 MB/s
4K Read 39
4K Write 145
4K Mixed 59.1
212% 81.1 MB/s
DQ Read 802
DQ Write 744
DQ Mixed 765
576% 770 MB/s
Poor: 144%
This bench: 167%
Great: 273%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$71
19GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10004
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 103 95 84 77 86 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
46.1% Average
Read 69.5
Write 94.7
Mixed 56.7
SusWrite 90.7
57% 77.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
204% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 77%
Seagate ST3250410AS 250GB-$97
231GB free
Firmware: 3.AAC
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 88.5
Write 85.7
Mixed 46.5
54% 73.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
153% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 29% Great: 55%
WD Elements 25A3 3TB
2TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 90 91 89 92 89 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
40.2% Average
Read 96
Write 96.2
Mixed 76.2
SusWrite 90.2
122% 89.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
105% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 69%
WD My Book 500GB
313GB free, PID 1100
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 37 37 37 37 37 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
20.8% Poor
Read 36
Write 37
Mixed 27.5
SusWrite 36.9
47% 34.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
111% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 20.8%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSB.16FBD 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
78.6% Very good
MC Read 29.9
MC Write 27.3
MC Mixed 27.6
81% 28.3 GB/s
SC Read 20.5
SC Write 28.3
SC Mixed 24.6
70% 24.5 GB/s
Latency 92.6
43% 92.6 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 92%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming K5-CF Builds (Compare 7,633 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K5-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $850
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $195Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9400F $156Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $510Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $56
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $47Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $67SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $70SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback