Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics23% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5  (all builds)
Memory6.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180315
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateApr 20 '19 at 18:37
Run Duration185 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X-$125
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
66.4% Good
Memory 60.4
1-Core 111
2-Core 215
70% 129 Pts
4-Core 389
8-Core 607
61% 498 Pts
64-Core 720
45% 720 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 418.81
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
23% Poor
Lighting 26.1
Reflection 20.3
Parallax 11.8
21% 19.4 fps
MRender 87
Gravity 9.03
Splatting 13
27% 36.3 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 23%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 320 Series 80GB-$60
5GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4PC10302
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,479
Write 46.5
Mixed 100
252% 1,209 MB/s
4K Read 374
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 6.3
576% 128 MB/s
Poor: 26% Great: 45%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
94GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 5839
Write 3,333
Mixed 3,979
968% 4,384 MB/s
4K Read 383
4K Write 228
4K Mixed 214
975% 275 MB/s
DQ Read 1,146
DQ Write 671
DQ Mixed 837
642% 885 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 118%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
410GB free
Firmware: 0109
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 357
Write 357
Mixed 307
76% 340 MB/s
4K Read 18
4K Write 22.6
4K Mixed 19.9
65% 20.2 MB/s
DQ Read 52
DQ Write 44.9
DQ Mixed 48.2
36% 48.4 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
30GB free
Firmware: JC45
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 107
Write 100
Mixed 61.3
66% 89.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 34% Great: 68%
Seagate Expansion Desk 3TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0737
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 107
Write 82.5
Mixed 69.5
64% 86.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 17% Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LED DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$161
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
67.2% Good
MC Read 27.6
MC Write 21.8
MC Mixed 25.6
71% 25 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 18.4
51% 18 GB/s
Latency 127
32% 127 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming 5 Builds (Compare 678 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 87%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 - $246

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $1,061
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback