| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 20.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 36.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus M5A97 LE R2.0 (all builds) |
| Memory | 5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20160324 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Apr 20 '19 at 00:53 |
| Run Duration | 127 Seconds |
| Run User | BRA-User |
| Background CPU | 24% |
PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
65.6%
Good
|
61% 95.1 Pts
|
34% 278 Pts
|
22% 355 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD R7 360-$100
CLim: 1070 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.4.2
|
20.5%
Poor
|
20% 27.1 fps
|
22% 26.3 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Sandisk PLUS 120 GB 120GB
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE3000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 38 53 28 53 61 MB/s
|
36.6%
Below average
|
26% 119 MB/s
|
63% 20.6 MB/s
|
31% 52.4 MB/s
|
|
WD Black 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$45
44GB free
Firmware: 12.01A12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 72 72 74 73 73 MB/s
|
44.3%
Average
|
52% 71.1 MB/s
|
166% 1.2 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GB-$35
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
48.3%
Average
|
49% 17.2 GB/s
|
29% 10.3 GB/s
|
63% 63.9 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical M5A97 LE R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,455 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus M5A97 LE R2.0 - $200
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 425x |
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 387x |
| FX-8320AMD $175Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 203x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 107x |
| GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 67x |
| RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 65x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 88% - Excellent | Total price: $334 |