Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics141% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
10 months ago, 10 months ago.
SystemGigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming
MotherboardGigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming  (all builds)
Memory26.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180705
Uptime9.3 Days
Run DateApr 19 '19 at 22:42
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-8700K-$370
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
103% Outstanding
1-Core 151
2-Core 297
106% 224 Pts
4-Core 575
8-Core 931
96% 753 Pts
64-Core 1,206
81% 1,206 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 103%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$808
CLim: 2050 MHz, MLim: 2808 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 419.35
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
141% Outstanding
Lighting 564
Reflection 504
Parallax 566
148% 545 fps
MRender 261
Gravity 547
Splatting 291
141% 367 fps
Poor: 78%
This bench: 141%
Great: 147%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$100
6GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 1,900
Write 1,326
Mixed 424
266% 1,217 MB/s
4K Read 46.4
4K Write 173
4K Mixed 50.2
226% 89.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,018
DQ Write 1,120
DQ Mixed 848
699% 995 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 238%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$38
409GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 135 135 135 135 135 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
91.2% Outstanding
Read 183
Write 153
Mixed 102
SusWrite 134
105% 143 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.2
233% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 91.2%
Great: 108%
WD Elements 1TB
755GB free, PID 1078
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 99 99 98 99 100 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
43.4% Average
Read 105
Write 106
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 98.9
124% 92.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
104% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 43%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
213GB free, PID a00d
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 43 43 42 42 42 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
20.8% Poor
Read 40.5
Write 36.2
Mixed 23.3
SusWrite 42.6
48% 35.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 20.8%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2C3000C15 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
97.2% Outstanding
MC Read 35.5
MC Write 37.5
MC Mixed 28.5
97% 33.8 GB/s
SC Read 23.2
SC Write 41.4
SC Mixed 31
91% 31.9 GB/s
Latency 51.6
78% 51.6 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 97.2%
Great: 107%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 8,696 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 88%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming - $170

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $1,254
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9600K $210Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $356AMD RX 590 $185Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $249
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $622SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback