Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 138%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 100%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics141% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
18 months ago, 18 months ago.
SystemGigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming
MotherboardGigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming  (all builds)
Memory25.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180705
Uptime9.3 Days
Run DateApr 19 '19 at 22:38
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$292
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Memory 96
1-Core 152
2-Core 302
103% 183 Pts
4-Core 560
8-Core 979
97% 770 Pts
64-Core 1,204
81% 1,204 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 100%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$808
CLim: 2050 MHz, MLim: 2808 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 419.35
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
141% Outstanding
Lighting 567
Reflection 508
Parallax 568
149% 548 fps
MRender 262
Gravity 548
Splatting 291
142% 367 fps
Poor: 120%
This bench: 141%
Great: 147%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$100
6GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 1,909
Write 1,347
Mixed 606
283% 1,287 MB/s
4K Read 53.4
4K Write 171
4K Mixed 64.7
254% 96.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,270
DQ Write 1,208
DQ Mixed 704
675% 1,060 MB/s
Poor: 150% Great: 231%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$34
409GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 133 135 135 135 135 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
91.7% Outstanding
Read 184
Write 161
Mixed 108
SusWrite 135
108% 147 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.2
237% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 91.7%
Great: 109%
WD Elements 1TB
755GB free, PID 1078
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 99 100 98 99 100 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
43.8% Average
Read 106
Write 106
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 98.8
124% 92.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
107% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 43%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
213GB free, PID a00d
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 43 43 43 43 43 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
20.1% Poor
Read 35.5
Write 41.7
Mixed 23.3
SusWrite 42.8
49% 35.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 20.1%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2C3000C15 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
94.7% Outstanding
MC Read 34
MC Write 37.2
MC Mixed 27.8
94% 33 GB/s
SC Read 21.9
SC Write 41.5
SC Mixed 29.6
89% 31 GB/s
Latency 53.9
74% 53.9 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 94.7%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 2,209 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 126%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 115%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming - $170

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $1,439
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $199Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10600K $260Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $548SanDisk Extreme 16GB $28
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback