Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	4.12% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	66% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3720QM-$100 9,911 User benchmarks, average bench 65% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	72.5% Very good	Memory 92 1-Core 91 2-Core 186 72% 123 Pts	4-Core 287 8-Core 465 46% 376 Pts	64-Core 468 29% 468 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 72.5% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K2000M 4,288 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Dell(1028 153E) 2GB Driver: nvd3dumx Ver. 21.21.13.7654 Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	4.12% Terrible	Lighting 4.67 Reflection 4.04 Parallax 5.16 4% 4.62 fps	MRender 5.95 Gravity 5.37 Splatting 5.96 5% 5.76 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.12% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intenso Sata III 256GB 2,573 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 214GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0817B0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 380 368 390 360 356 348 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	66% Good	Read 454 Write 368 Mixed 284 SusWrite 367 83% 368 MB/s	4K Read 10.2 4K Write 45.2 4K Mixed 10 52% 21.8 MB/s	DQ Read 117 DQ Write 334 DQ Mixed 29.8 79% 160 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 66% Great: 95%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston X7C75G-HYC 2x4GB 334 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	66.6% Good	MC Read 25.4 MC Write 24 MC Mixed 21.9 68% 23.8 GB/s	SC Read 18.2 SC Write 16.6 SC Mixed 17.7 50% 17.5 GB/s	Latency 64 62% 64 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 66.6% Great: 68%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	176x
Quadro K2000MNvidiaBench 6%, 4,288 samples	137x
Quadro K1000MNvidiaBench 3%, 4,204 samples	85x

SSD
PM830 mSATA 256GBSamsungBench 63%, 9,379 samples	30x
MX500 1TBCrucial $66Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	13x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	12x

RAM
X7C75G-HYC 4x4GBKingstonBench 60%, 524 samples	32x
M471B1G73BH0-CK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 51%, 1,654 samples	15x
X7C75G-HYC 2x4GBKingstonBench 58%, 334 samples	11x

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $220

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16