Asus TUF H370-PRO GAMING (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics31.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive168% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF H370-PRO GAMING (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory13.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180620
Uptime7.8 Days
Run DateApr 18 '19 at 15:17
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User ISR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-8700-$350
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
89.2% Excellent
1-Core 134
2-Core 266
94% 200 Pts
4-Core 488
8-Core 830
83% 659 Pts
64-Core 1,066
72% 1,066 Pts
Poor: 77%
This bench: 89.2%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$148
Asus(1043 8611) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.11
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
31.2% Below average
Lighting 122
Reflection 81.1
Parallax 122
32% 108 fps
MRender 81.2
Gravity 120
Splatting 83.5
31% 95 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31.2%
Great: 34%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$100
95GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 592 294 291 287 285 283 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
168% Outstanding
Read 1,055
Write 930
Mixed 458
SusWrite 339
155% 695 MB/s
4K Read 42
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 48.8
191% 71 MB/s
DQ Read 1,072
DQ Write 1,032
DQ Mixed 679
612% 927 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 168%
Great: 238%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$60
12GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 77 80 77 82 78 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
44.2% Average
Read 74.8
Write 51
Mixed 61.6
SusWrite 78.9
49% 66.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 87%
WD WD20EACS-11BHUB0 2TB
29GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 66 68 67 69 68 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
31.4% Below average
Read 42.3
Write 56.5
Mixed 21.7
SusWrite 67.1
34% 46.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.3
56% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 66%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$40
931GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 176 175 176 175 174 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 176
Write 160
Mixed 67.7
SusWrite 175
106% 145 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
165% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 101%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
79.5% Very good
MC Read 31.1
MC Write 29.9
MC Mixed 22.4
79% 27.8 GB/s
SC Read 19.4
SC Write 32.2
SC Mixed 24.8
73% 25.5 GB/s
Latency 63.8
63% 63.8 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 94%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TUF H370-PRO GAMING (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 548 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 120%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 88%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF H370-PRO GAMING (WI-FI)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $799
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $138Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $210Nvidia GTX 1660 $210Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $340Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $260Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $51
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback