Asus TUF H370-PRO GAMING (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 113%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine
-
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics39.7% is a below average 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive168% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF H370-PRO GAMING (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory13.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180620
Uptime7.8 Days
Run DateApr 18 '19 at 15:17
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User ISR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i7-8700-$300
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
103% Outstanding
SC Int 130
SC Float 139
SC Mixed 134
107% 134 Pts
QC Int 495
QC Float 536
QC Mixed 488
115% 506 Pts
MC Int 987
MC Float 1,124
MC Mixed 1,066
158% 1,059 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 103%
Great: 109%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$144
Asus(1043 8611) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.11
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
39.7% Below average
Lighting 122
Reflection 81.1
Parallax 122
38% 108 fps
MRender 81.2
Gravity 120
Splatting 83.5
41% 95 fps
Poor: 33%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 42%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$100
95GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 592 294 291 287 285 283 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
168% Outstanding
Read 1,055
Write 930
Mixed 458
SusWrite 339
155% 695 MB/s
4K Read 42
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 48.8
191% 71 MB/s
DQ Read 1,072
DQ Write 1,032
DQ Mixed 679
612% 927 MB/s
Poor: 140%
This bench: 168%
Great: 237%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$55
12GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 77 80 77 82 78 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
44.2% Average
Read 74.8
Write 51
Mixed 61.6
SusWrite 78.9
49% 66.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 87%
WD WD20EACS-11BHUB0 2TB
29GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 66 68 67 69 68 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
31.4% Below average
Read 42.3
Write 56.5
Mixed 21.7
SusWrite 67.1
34% 46.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.3
56% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 66%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$43
931GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 176 175 176 175 174 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 176
Write 160
Mixed 67.7
SusWrite 175
106% 145 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
165% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 101%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
79.5% Very good
MC Read 31.1
MC Write 29.9
MC Mixed 22.4
79% 27.8 GB/s
SC Read 19.4
SC Write 32.2
SC Mixed 24.8
73% 25.5 GB/s
Latency 63.8
63% 63.8 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 95%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

Typical TUF H370-PRO GAMING (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 355 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 132%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF H370-PRO GAMING (WI-FI)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 155% - Outstanding Total price: $718
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $356Nvidia GTX 1070 $380Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $92
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 $139Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $208Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $99
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $108Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $808Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $90SanDisk Extreme 64GB $128
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $43G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $601SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $95SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback