Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics21.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive97% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (87%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140403
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 17 '19 at 22:37
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 87%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.35 GHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
63.7% Good
Memory 79.1
1-Core 73.3
2-Core 135
58% 95.7 Pts
4-Core 262
8-Core 400
41% 331 Pts
64-Core 456
28% 456 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Asus(1043 8422) 2GB
CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 425.31
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
21.4% Poor
Lighting 24.9
Reflection 23.7
Parallax 31.1
20% 26.6 fps
MRender 33.3
Gravity 29.8
Splatting 24.8
24% 29.3 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 21.4%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 3D 500GB-$67
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X611
SusWrite @10s intervals: 241 361 357 355 360 304 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
97% Outstanding
Read 446
Write 411
Mixed 299
SusWrite 330
83% 371 MB/s
4K Read 32.3
4K Write 90.6
4K Mixed 43.5
153% 55.5 MB/s
DQ Read 282
DQ Write 245
DQ Mixed 248
190% 258 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 97%
Great: 117%
Sandisk PLUS 480 GB 480GB
67GB free
Firmware: UG36
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 116 142 218 221 240 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
54.4% Above average
Read 460
Write 300
Mixed 301
SusWrite 172
69% 308 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 37
4K Mixed 17.9
74% 25.2 MB/s
DQ Read 115
DQ Write 22.2
DQ Mixed 25.2
30% 54.2 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 57%
WD VelociRaptor 250GB-$35
230GB free
Firmware: 04.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 136 137 137 136 136 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
77.1% Very good
Read 138
Write 134
Mixed 122
SusWrite 130
97% 131 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 1.6
332% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 111%
Seagate Barracuda Green 1TB-$580
220GB free
Firmware: CC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 115 122 111 113 119 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
65.2% Good
Read 117
Write 134
Mixed 69.8
SusWrite 111
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.9
152% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 75%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$32
488GB free
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 108 106 107 108 109 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
57.7% Above average
Read 99.5
Write 54.1
Mixed 71.8
SusWrite 101
60% 81.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-020.A00LF 99U5471-020.A00LF Team--Elite-1333 Team--Elite-1333 16GB
1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
39.5% Below average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 13.1
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 11.1
27% 9.6 GB/s
Latency 82.1
49% 82.1 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 753 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $729
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback