Asus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics47.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2070 = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER  (all builds)
Memory26.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160325
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 17 '19 at 18:43
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-6700K-$298
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
80.9% Excellent
1-Core 129
2-Core 243
88% 186 Pts
4-Core 425
8-Core 659
69% 542 Pts
64-Core 670
45% 670 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$540
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 425.31
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (163 fps cap detected)
47.4% Average
Lighting 162
Reflection 164
Parallax 163
43% 163 fps
MRender 163
Gravity 163
Splatting 164
48% 163 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 115%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Intel 600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$299
165GB free
Firmware: PSF109C Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 553 553 556 555 138 214 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
127% Outstanding
Read 848
Write 554
Mixed 658
SusWrite 428
139% 622 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 92.1
4K Mixed 43.8
148% 54.8 MB/s
DQ Read 520
DQ Write 439
DQ Mixed 473
356% 477 MB/s
Poor: 105%
This bench: 127%
Great: 285%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB0Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 490
Write 450
Mixed 375
98% 438 MB/s
4K Read 37.1
4K Write 72.3
4K Mixed 45.6
153% 51.7 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 231
209% 317 MB/s
Poor: 67% Great: 117%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$80
71GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 2,362
Write 1,468
Mixed 1,284
376% 1,705 MB/s
4K Read 45
4K Write 94.9
4K Mixed 58.7
194% 66.2 MB/s
DQ Read 455
DQ Write 401
DQ Mixed 430
322% 429 MB/s
Poor: 174% Great: 276%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$76
827GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 170 170 173 172 173 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
90.8% Outstanding
Read 144
Write 150
Mixed 29.2
SusWrite 172
89% 124 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 1.9
351% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 90.8%
Great: 110%
JetFlash Transcend 16GB
10GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 22 21 23 23 21 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
23.9% Poor
Read 93.3
Write 23.2
Mixed 40.5
SusWrite 22.7
50% 44.9 MB/s
4K Read 4.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 2.2
140% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 23.9%
Great: 30%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled
70.7% Very good
MC Read 25.8
MC Write 27.5
MC Mixed 21.5
71% 24.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 28.3
SC Mixed 20
62% 21.8 GB/s
Latency 72.7
55% 72.7 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 106%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical MAXIMUS VIII RANGER Builds (Compare 8,636 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER - $157

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $971
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $148Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $195AMD RX 590 $185Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $340Nvidia RTX 2060 $325Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $51
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $71SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $609SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $68SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback