Asrock X99 OC Formula/3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 98%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.5%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics88.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive257% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X99 OC Formula/3.1  (all builds)
Memory28.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180406
Uptime3.8 Days
Run DateApr 17 '19 at 15:14
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-5930K-$560
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
89.5% Excellent
1-Core 117
2-Core 246
85% 182 Pts
4-Core 510
8-Core 834
85% 672 Pts
64-Core 1,007
68% 1,007 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 89.5%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980 Ti-$480
Gigabyte(1458 36CF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1607 MHz, MLim: 1800 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 425.31
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
88.3% Excellent
Lighting 356
Reflection 319
Parallax 380
93% 352 fps
MRender 212
Gravity 321
Splatting 224
82% 252 fps
Poor: 60%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 88%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$350
350GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B0Q Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1102 1063 1101 1091 1072 1057 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
257% Outstanding
Read 2081
Write 1,338
Mixed 807
SusWrite 1,081
295% 1,327 MB/s
4K Read 48.6
4K Write 170
4K Mixed 65.3
247% 94.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,032
DQ Write 394
DQ Mixed 447
401% 624 MB/s
Poor: 137%
This bench: 257%
Great: 282%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$102
389GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 484 479 482 481 480 481 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
129% Outstanding
Read 484
Write 470
Mixed 363
SusWrite 481
101% 450 MB/s
4K Read 44.8
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 62
206% 72.5 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 358
269% 359 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 129%
Great: 134%
WD Gold 4TB (2016)-$137
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01M02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 146 156 154 146 150 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
84% Excellent
Read 142
Write 144
Mixed 75.5
SusWrite 151
94% 128 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.6
184% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 84%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3333 C16 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2201 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
118% Outstanding
MC Read 45.1
MC Write 47.5
MC Mixed 42.4
129% 45 GB/s
SC Read 18.3
SC Write 23.6
SC Mixed 24.9
64% 22.3 GB/s
Latency 52.2
77% 52.2 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 118%
Great: 167%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

Typical X99 OC Formula/3.1 Builds (Compare 98 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 95%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X99 OC Formula/3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $1,115
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $143Nvidia GTX 1660 $220Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $86
Intel Core i5-9600K $219Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $270Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $102
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 $198AMD RX 580 $173Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $97
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $42G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $695SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback