ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP Laptop 17z-ca000

Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	5.72% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	97% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	HP Laptop 17z-ca000 (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 84D2
Memory	11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190104
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 17 '19 at 05:38
Run Duration	134 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U 61,910 User benchmarks, average bench 49% FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	68.7% Good	Memory 71.1 1-Core 106 2-Core 221 73% 133 Pts	4-Core 356 8-Core 558 56% 457 Pts	64-Core 526 32% 526 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 68.7% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU) 85,536 User benchmarks, average bench 10% HP(103C 84D2) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 17.7 Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	5.72% Terrible	Lighting 2.77 Reflection 6.46 Parallax 20.6 2% 9.93 fps	MRender 12.8 Gravity 13.5 Splatting 18 12% 14.8 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 5.72% Great: 11%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 380GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 310 425 430 409 447 339 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	97% Outstanding	Read 481 Write 430 Mixed 424 SusWrite 393 97% 432 MB/s	4K Read 33.9 4K Write 72.3 4K Mixed 41.3 143% 49.2 MB/s	DQ Read 227 DQ Write 200 DQ Mixed 212 159% 213 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 97% Great: 129%
CT500MX5 00SSD1 500GB 21 User benchmarks, average bench 197% 315GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 35 35 35 36 35 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	52.6% Above average	Read 36.6 Write 30.4 Mixed 33.2 SusWrite 34.4 46% 33.7 MB/s	4K Read 11.1 4K Write 12.1 4K Mixed 11.5 844% 11.6 MB/s	DQ Read 12.3 DQ Write 13.8 DQ Mixed 13 957% 13 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 52.6% Great: 388%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB 108,106 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	84.4% Excellent	MC Read 30.8 MC Write 33.1 MC Mixed 27.9 87% 30.6 GB/s	SC Read 22 SC Write 33.1 SC Mixed 23.1 74% 26.1 GB/s	Latency 98.8 40% 98.8 ns
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 84.4% Great: 84%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical Laptop 17z-ca000 Builds (Compare 30 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop

Desktop 33%

Sail boat

Workstation

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 17z-ca000

CPU
A9-9425 APU (2016 M.SR)AMDBench 27%, 15,014 samples	21x
Ryzen 5 2500UAMDBench 49%, 61,910 samples	4x
Ryzen 3 2300UAMDBench 55%, 3,165 samples	4x

GPU
Radeon R5 GraphicsAMDBench 3%, 31,419 samples	21x
RX Vega 6 (Ryzen iGPU)AMDBench 8%, 2,318 samples	4x
RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU)AMDBench 10%, 85,536 samples	4x

SSD
SA400S37960G 960GBKingstonBench 70%, 56,609 samples	3x
MZ7TD256HAFV-000L7 256GBSamsungBench 61%, 6,630 samples	1x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	1x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 96,646 samples	4x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples	4x
HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 2x8GBHynixBench 74%, 28,425 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback