Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 2GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Compaq dc5850 Microtower (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 3029h
Memory	0.8 GB free of 2.00098 GB @ 0.8 GHz
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20080409
Uptime	2.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 16 '19 at 18:24
Run Duration	118 Seconds
Run User	PAK-User
Background CPU	49%

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom X3 8600B 388 User benchmarks, average bench 42% XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	36.1% Below average	Memory 59.3 1-Core 32.5 2-Core 62.8 34% 51.5 Pts	4-Core 76.4 8-Core 85.2 11% 80.8 Pts	64-Core 86.6 5% 86.6 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 36.1% Great: 46%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate ST3250820AS 250GB-$60 16,391 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 83GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3.ALE SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 40 61 57 52 57 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	16.9% Very poor	Read 10.8 Write 14.8 Mixed 13.5 SusWrite 48.1 16% 21.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.2 34% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 16.9% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 35GB 2,113 User benchmarks, average bench 13% null MHz 1024, 1024, 33792 MB Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	14.5% Very poor	MC Read 4.7 MC Write 4.5 MC Mixed 4.5 13% 4.57 GB/s	SC Read 4.4 SC Write 4.1 SC Mixed 3.7 12% 4.07 GB/s	Latency 130 31% 130 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 14.5% Great: 19%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 38%

Jet ski

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Athlon Dual Core 5000BAMDBench 38%, 530 samples	6x
Athlon Dual Core 4450BAMD $21Bench 35%, 535 samples	5x
Phenom X3 8600BAMDBench 42%, 388 samples	5x

GPU
Radeon 3100 GraphicsATIBench 0%, 1,215 samples	14x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	2x
GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples	1x

SSD
Solid State Disk 512GBSpccBench 71%, 30,264 samples	2x
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	1x
840 Evo 120GBSamsung $85Bench 91%, 104,444 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16